Nick Clegg has decided to go on the offensive against the Institute for Fiscal Studies analysis which shows that, despite Coalition claims that ‘the broadest shoulders are bearing the greatest burden’ and that the Comprehensive Spending Review’s slash and burn of public services is ‘progressive and fair’, the poorest 10% of society will be hit the hardest. He claims that the IFS has failed to take into account the full package of measures as outlined in the Emergency Budget in June as well as the CSR. Would these be the measures which the IFS found, at the time, to be ‘clearly regressive’ taken on their own and only ‘progressive’ when taking into account the tax and benefit proposals of the departing Labour government?
Tags2010 Alan Johnson Ann Pettifor BBC bigot blame budget cuts cheating child benefit coalition Coalition government comprehensive spending review contradiction cuts cuts. recession David Blanchflower David Cameron David Laws debates deficit depression economics economy Ed Miliband election election 2010 Europe expenses fairness FIFA World Cup 2010 Free speech fundamentalism George Osbourne Ghana Gordon Brown government handball IFS Institute for Fiscal Studies integration Ireland Islam Jonathan Freedland Joseph Stiglitz Labour multiculturalism Muslims Nick Clegg party leaders penalty goal politics poor population private sector progressive public sector public spending Quarter Final regressive religion resignation secularism Shadow Cabinet Shadow Chancellor stay at home mums threat Tories Treasury TV UK UK economy UK government UK politics unfairness Uraguy